Expert Lets ChatGPT Write Up To 90 Percent Of Legal Report In Disastrous Deposition Blunder

An expert witness made a significant error in judgement by allowing ChatGPT to draft between 85 and 90 percent of his professional legal report.

The decision proved immediately costly when the plaintiffs’ attorney seized on the revelation during what observers are describing as a deposition for the ages.

Using AI tools to generate substantive expert content raises serious questions about accountability, professional standards, and the integrity of evidence submitted in legal proceedings.

The incident highlights growing concerns about how artificial intelligence is being deployed in high-stakes legal environments without adequate scrutiny or oversight.

Meanwhile, a separate legal drama continues to unfold around a major Biglaw executive order case, centred on one closely guarded secret: who actually wrote the orders in question.

A government that has been vocal and confident at the podium has apparently grown reluctant to put names to the documents at the heart of the dispute.

The contrast between public confidence and private reticence has drawn considerable attention from legal observers watching the case unfold closely.

On a more celebratory note, the legal industry has been recognising the standout performers in client service, identifying which Biglaw firms and individual lawyers are considered the very best in their field.

In a curious ruling touching on artificial intelligence and the judiciary, a court has determined that even if a judge had used AI to decide a case, such a decision would likely be covered by judicial immunity.

The judge in question is understood not to have actually used AI in reaching her decision, but the ruling nonetheless sets a notable precedent in the evolving conversation around technology and judicial accountability.

Finally, immigration lawyers are urging individuals to carefully consider their personal risk before boarding any aircraft, whether for domestic or international travel, given the current climate around immigration enforcement.

The warning reflects a broader atmosphere of uncertainty, with legal professionals advising immigrants to seek tailored legal guidance before making any travel plans.