Legal & Compliance - Page 20

President Donald Trump signed three proclamations on July 20, 2026, imposing additional 50% duties on specified Canadian goods covering motor vehicles, alcoholic beverages and dairy products. The tariffs mark the first-ever use

Ninth Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke has drawn sharp criticism after filing a dissent that urged the Supreme Court to summarily reverse his own court’s Second Amendment rulings. The dissent came in the

India’s pharmaceutical and healthcare regulatory landscape continued to evolve significantly during the first half of 2026, with authorities introducing a range of new measures and frameworks. The changes were aimed at simplifying

The University of Michigan’s athletic department has faced a series of high-profile controversies over recent years, drawing intense public and legal scrutiny from multiple directions. Those controversies include the Connor Stallions sign-stealing

Linklaters has reported record financial results for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2026, marking the third consecutive year of double-digit profit growth for the Magic Circle firm. The London-headquartered law firm

A widely held belief in international trade circles is that only the importer of record bears legal responsibility for customs duties when goods enter the United States. Many companies have structured their

In legal departments across the corporate world, compliance conversations that drag on for weeks rarely end because lawyers found the right argument. They end, more often, because someone finally explained the problem

University of Houston law professor Renee Knake Jefferson has been examining the latest developments across lawyer and judicial ethics in her ongoing Legal Ethics Roundup series. Supreme Court justices have testified about

The fifth and final day of the NAW v. Feldon bench trial centred on whether Oregon’s Extended Producer Responsibility programme is practically workable and legally sound. The case involves a challenge by

A California Court of Appeal has ruled for the first time that harassment based on sexual orientation constitutes sexual harassment under state law, with major implications for arbitration agreements. The decision, reached