Legal & Compliance - Page 42

Relativity has unveiled claiR, a conversational AI interface allowing lawyers to ask plain-language questions across an entire RelativityOne matter and receive cited answers. The product is designed to give legal professionals direct

Justice Amy Coney Barrett closed the Supreme Court’s 2023 term with two notable dissents that challenge easy political categorisation of her legal philosophy. In *Ohio v. EPA*, Barrett sided with the Court’s

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission held a public hearing on August 11, 2026, examining its proposal to rescind long-standing EEO-1 workforce reporting requirements. Twenty-two witnesses appeared before the Commission, with the

Employers cannot simply place a disabled employee on unpaid leave and consider their obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act fulfilled, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled. The court reversed

A private Signal group chat among Yale Law School graduates has become the latest talking point in Washington circles, dedicated to discussing JD and Usha Vance. The existence of the group was

Today’s legal headlines span federal courts, high-profile criminal cases, and a striking new twist on artificial intelligence in the courtroom. A judge has threatened the Department of Justice with contempt in connection

Arthur M. Blank Sports and Entertainment’s Nick Brown has opened up about his legal career in a new episode of the Talking Sports Law podcast series. Brown serves as Vice President and

Wayfair LLC is facing continued legal exposure in California after a federal court allowed key privacy claims against the online home goods retailer to move forward. The United States District Court for

The Trump administration has deployed a sweeping digital surveillance operation targeting individuals who criticise Immigration and Customs Enforcement online. ICE has been running a round-the-clock digital dragnet, scouring public platforms including Facebook,

A California court has dismissed a privacy lawsuit against jeweler Maison Miru, ruling the plaintiff failed to demonstrate sufficient concrete harm under Article III standing requirements. The case, Bonkowski v. Maison Miru